庭審是當(dāng)事人為了實(shí)現(xiàn)自己的利益而進(jìn)行質(zhì)辯的對(duì)抗性言語(yǔ)活動(dòng)。根據(jù)有關(guān)法律的規(guī)定，法庭庭審分為宣布開(kāi)庭、法庭調(diào)查、法庭辯論、最后陳述和判決五個(gè)階段。其中法庭調(diào)查和法庭辯論是庭審不可或缺的階段，更是實(shí)現(xiàn)司法公正，維護(hù)當(dāng)事人權(quán)益的核心手段。勿庸置疑，法庭話語(yǔ)研究的中心也集中于對(duì)法庭調(diào)查和法庭辯論階段庭審技巧及語(yǔ)言特點(diǎn)的研究。 本文以真實(shí)的庭審話語(yǔ)為語(yǔ)料，以會(huì)話分析作為理論基礎(chǔ)，對(duì)庭審中出現(xiàn)頻率很高的打斷現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行研究。首先，基于對(duì)Sacks,Schegloff和Jefferson提出的話輪轉(zhuǎn)換模式（turn-taking model）及機(jī)構(gòu)話語(yǔ)的回顧和分析，作者將法官在庭審中的作用主要?dú)w納為三方面：（1）分配話輪（Turn allocation），（2）控制話輪長(zhǎng)度（Control the turn size），（3）話輪仲裁（Turn mediation）。第二，為了更好的研究法官語(yǔ)言，本文以打斷現(xiàn)象為切入點(diǎn)，總結(jié)Ferguoson、Murray及Watts等人提出的不同特點(diǎn) 將打斷為butting in interruption,overlap,silent interruption,... 

【文章來(lái)源】：廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)廣東省

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：73 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
DECLARATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABSTRACT
中文摘要
LIST OF FIGURES
TRANSCRIPTION CONVENTIONS
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
    1.1 INTRODUCTION
    1.2 DEFINITIONS OF TERMS: TURN-TAKING, OVERLAPPING AND INTERRUPTION
    1.3 RATIONALE OF THE STUDY
    1.4 DATAAND METHODOLOGY
        1.4.1 The analyzing tool—conversation analysis （CA）
        1.4.2 Research questions of this thesis
    1.5 OUTLINE OF THE WHOLE PAPER
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE RELEVANT LITERATURE
    2.1 INTRODUCTION
    2.2 STUDIES ON CONVERSATION ANALYSIS （CA）
        2.2.1 Introduction and historical background
        2.2.2 A concise introduction of the turn-taking model
    2.3 STUDIES ON INTERRUPTION AND SIMULTANEOUS SPEECH
        2.3.1 Differing interruption from overlap
        2.3.2 Interruption as face-threatening act （FTA） and the exercise of power
        2.3.3 Studies on interruption in courtroom interaction
    2.4 STUDIES ON INSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSE
        2.4.1 Using CA study institutional discourse
        2.4.2 Institutional Studies on Courtroom Interaction
        2.4.3 Studies on asymmetry and power
    2.5 BRIEF INTRODUCTION OF CHINESE CIVIL PROCEDURES
    2.6 MODIFICATION OF TURN-TAKING STRUCTURE IN COURTROOM
CHAPTER 3 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
    3.1 INTRODUCTION
    3.2 TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF TURN
    3.3 THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE PRESENT STUDY
        3.3.1 The causes of interruption/overlapping
        3.3.2 Description of the theoretical framework
    3.5 SUMMARY
CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS OF COURTROOM INTERRUPTIONS
    4.1 INTRODUCTION
    4.2 TRIAL TALK: THE ROLE OF JUDGE IN COURTROOM INTERACTION
        4.2.1 Judge talk: keeping order in court
        4.2.2 Judicial monologue: court instructions and rulings
        4.2.3 Judicial Dialogue: objections and asking for clarification
    4.3 METHODS TO INTERRUPTION IN COURTROOM INTERACTION
        4.3.1 Butting in interruption
        4.3.2 Silent interruption: intervening without overlap
        4.3.3 Simple interruption
        4.3.4 Overlap
    4.4 POWER AND LANGUAGE IN THE COURTROOM
        4.4.1 Power relations in the courtroom
        4.4.2 Rule-oriented versus relation-oriented accounts
    4.5 CAUSES AND PLACES OF INTERRUPTION IN THE COURTROOM
        4.5.1 Dissynchronization
        4.5.2 Role-conflict
        4.5.3 Procedural Limit
    4.5 SUMMARY
CHAPTER 5 ATTEMPTED EXPLANATIONS
    5.1 SUMMERY OF THE PRESENT STUDY
    5.2 MAJOR FINDINGS
    5.3 IMPLICATIONS
    5.4 LIMITATIONS
    5.5 SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE STUDIES
BIBLIOGRAPHY


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]口語(yǔ)交談中的話語(yǔ)打斷現(xiàn)象[J]. 匡小榮.  修辭學(xué)習(xí). 2005(04)
[2]民事庭審程序中的若干問(wèn)題研究[J]. 相慶梅.  現(xiàn)代法學(xué). 2005(02)
[3]自然會(huì)話中的打斷現(xiàn)象分析[J]. 李悅娥,申智奇.  當(dāng)代語(yǔ)言學(xué). 2003(01)

碩士論文
[1]如何在法庭問(wèn)話中通過(guò)話題控制獲取所需信息——語(yǔ)篇分析研究[D]. 葛云鋒.廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué) 2004
[2]法庭交叉詢問(wèn)的鄰近應(yīng)對(duì)分析[D]. 韓征瑞.廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué) 2004



本文編號(hào)：2903003