【摘要】：隨著社會主義經(jīng)濟(jì)體制與政治體制改革的不斷深入,當(dāng)前我國正處于經(jīng)濟(jì)社會快速發(fā)展期,也是社會矛盾的凸顯期,社會主體之間的關(guān)系正處于比較復(fù)雜的狀態(tài)之中,各種觀念、各種利益急劇碰撞。糾紛的主體、內(nèi)容與形式更加多樣化,矛盾誘發(fā)因素更是紛繁復(fù)雜。治安調(diào)解制度作為多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制的重要組成部分,因其固有的特點(diǎn)、獨(dú)特的優(yōu)勢,在維護(hù)社會治安秩序與促進(jìn)社會安定團(tuán)結(jié)上發(fā)揮著不可替代的作用。治安調(diào)解制度發(fā)端于新中國成立之初,其產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展適應(yīng)我國的政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會環(huán)境并順應(yīng)了國際化ADR潮流。時至今日,治安調(diào)解制度正逐步趨向完善,但也存在著一些問題。筆者結(jié)合自己的公安工作實(shí)踐,針對我國治安調(diào)解制度的弊端,提出膚淺的建議,以期有益于我國治安調(diào)解制度的發(fā)展與完備。 本文分為四章。第一章為治安調(diào)解制度基本理論,從治安調(diào)解的內(nèi)涵入手,闡述治安調(diào)解的背景、概念、性質(zhì)、特征、價值以及與其他糾紛調(diào)解方式的區(qū)別。第二章主要分析治安調(diào)解制度的適用范圍和適用條件,另就治安調(diào)解制度適用中的自愿原則與“事實(shí)不清而當(dāng)事人愿意調(diào)解”的治安案件作出探討。第三章則指出現(xiàn)行治安調(diào)解制度在立法上和執(zhí)法實(shí)踐中的弊端。立法上的不足主要是治安調(diào)解協(xié)議不具有強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行力、治安調(diào)解程序缺乏可操作性以及治安調(diào)解監(jiān)督救濟(jì)機(jī)制的缺失；執(zhí)法實(shí)踐中的弊端主要是濫用自由裁量權(quán)、治安調(diào)解外延擴(kuò)大化和違背自愿原則。此外,在提出現(xiàn)行調(diào)解制度不足的基礎(chǔ)上,對新型調(diào)解機(jī)制進(jìn)行評價。第四章是對完備治安調(diào)解制度提出建議。首先是明確治安調(diào)解協(xié)議的強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行力；其次是進(jìn)一步完善治安調(diào)解程序；再次是建立及完善治安調(diào)解的司法審查和救濟(jì)機(jī)制；最后建議整合調(diào)解機(jī)制,有效利用調(diào)解資源,并將治安調(diào)解制度與人民調(diào)解制度、司法調(diào)解制度進(jìn)行有機(jī)聯(lián)系。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of the reform of the socialist economic system and the political system, our country is in the period of rapid economic and social development, which is also the prominent period of social contradictions, and the relationship between the social subjects is in a more complex state. Ideas and interests collided sharply. The subject, content and form of the dispute are more diversified, and the cause of contradiction is more complicated. As an important part of the pluralistic dispute resolution system, the public security mediation system plays an irreplaceable role in maintaining public order and promoting social stability and unity because of its inherent characteristics and unique advantages. The system of public security mediation began at the beginning of the founding of New China, and its emergence and development adapted to the political, economic and social environment of our country and complied with the trend of internationalized ADR. Today, the public security mediation system is gradually becoming perfect, but there are also some problems. Combined with my own practice of public security work, the author puts forward some superficial suggestions in view of the malpractice of our country's public security mediation system, in order to benefit the development and perfection of our country's public security mediation system. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is the basic theory of public security mediation system, starting with the connotation of public security mediation, expounds the background, concept, nature, characteristics, value and differences with other dispute mediation methods. The second chapter mainly analyzes the applicable scope and conditions of the public security mediation system, and discusses the voluntary principle in the application of the public security mediation system and the public security cases in which the parties are willing to mediate because the facts are not clear. The third chapter points out the drawbacks of the current public security mediation system in legislation and law enforcement practice. The shortcomings in legislation are that the public security mediation agreement is not enforceable, the procedure of public security mediation is not operable and the mechanism of supervision and relief of public security mediation is lacking; the abuse of discretion is the main drawback in the practice of law enforcement. The extension of public security mediation is expanded and the voluntary principle is violated. In addition, the new mediation mechanism is evaluated on the basis of the deficiency of the current mediation system. The fourth chapter is to put forward the suggestion to the complete public security mediation system. The first is to clarify the enforcement of the public security mediation agreement; the second is to further improve the public security mediation procedures; thirdly, to establish and perfect the judicial review and relief mechanism of public security mediation; finally, to propose the integration of mediation mechanisms and the effective use of mediation resources. And the public security mediation system and the people's mediation system, judicial mediation system organically linked.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.14

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 占錦;中國傳統(tǒng)調(diào)解制度的運(yùn)行機(jī)制及其特點(diǎn)[J];北京教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年04期

2 孟昭陽;;治安調(diào)解的界定及適用范圍與條件[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年06期

3 孟昭陽;;治安調(diào)解存在的問題與制度完善[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年01期

4 余晟;俞志力;;對提高青年民警治安調(diào)解職業(yè)能力的思考[J];公安學(xué)刊(浙江警察學(xué)院學(xué)報);2010年02期

5 蔣為群;;完善我國治安調(diào)解的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];公安研究;2008年06期

6 張洪波;論警察行政調(diào)解[J];江蘇公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2001年03期

7 張興國;公安調(diào)解若干問題辨析[J];江蘇公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2002年02期

8 李文學(xué);戴曉青;黃慶強(qiáng);;公安調(diào)解與司法審判的契合運(yùn)作[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年05期

9 張金祥;;治安糾紛調(diào)解模式的解析與修正[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2007年03期

10 陳丹寧;趙曉潔;;論人民調(diào)解、司法調(diào)解、行政調(diào)解的有效銜接[J];消費(fèi)導(dǎo)刊;2010年08期

，

本文編號：2145172