發(fā)布時間：2018-05-01 18:24

  本文選題：國際投資仲裁 + “第三方參與”規(guī)則��； 參考：《廣西大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：國際投資仲裁中的“第三方參與”規(guī)則是指在仲裁庭審理案件的過程中,爭端當事方以外的第三方向仲裁庭提供與案件有關的事實或者適用法律方面的意見,以影響裁決的一項制度。國際投資仲裁當中的“第三方參與”包括普通法庭之友以及非爭端締約方的參與(母國參與)。在目前主要幾種投資仲裁機制如ICSID仲裁機制和UNCITRAL仲裁機制都是援用或直接適用國際商事仲裁來解決投資爭端,早期都具保密性特征。而國際投資協定傳統(tǒng)上并不包括“第三方參與”的規(guī)定。由于國際投資仲裁通常牽涉到政府為保護公共利益目的的管理行為,因而,國際投資仲裁會影響到東道國的管理決策。此時,在保密程序基礎上作出的裁決會影響到國家的政策方針的實施,不利于維護社會公共利益,進而不利于維護國際投資仲裁的合法性與正當性。因此,“第三方參與”規(guī)則逐漸出現在相關仲裁規(guī)則以及案例當中。晚近,中國正在與美國、加拿大等發(fā)達國家進行BIT談判,對方提出的BIT草案中都已擬定“第三方參與”條款,那么,中國是否應接受這些“第三方參與”條款?因此,“第三方參與”規(guī)則就成為一個急需解決的課題。 經過較深入的研究,本文得出結論：從中國這一主要以資本輸入國身份參加國際投資活動的發(fā)展中國家來說,在一定條件下接受“第三方參與”規(guī)則,總體上利大于弊。 除引言與結論外,論文共分為四章： 第一章介紹“第三方參與”規(guī)則如何進入國際投資仲裁中且得到快速發(fā)展。 第二章探討“第三方參與”規(guī)則在ICSID體制、UNCITRAL以及美國BIT (2004)范本的最新發(fā)展,同時通過對國際投資仲裁案例的分析,概括出仲裁庭在“第三方參與”規(guī)則方面的一些傾向性,以便為中國是否接受“第三方參與”規(guī)則的探討打下基礎。 第三章分析接受“第三方參與”規(guī)則所帶來的潛在利益及消極影響。得出結論：從中國這一主要以資本輸入國身份參加國際投資活動的發(fā)展中國家來說,總體上利大于弊。 第四章從主體、權利及義務三個方面對如何構建中國式BIT中的“第三方參與”規(guī)則提出建議。
[Abstract]:The "third party participation" rule in international investment arbitration refers to a third party other than a party to a dispute who provides the arbitral tribunal with factual or applicable legal advice relating to the case in the course of the hearing of the case by the arbitral tribunal, A system to influence decisions. "third party participation" in international investment arbitration includes the participation of amicus curiae and non-disputing parties (home country participation). At present, several major investment arbitration mechanisms, such as ICSID arbitration mechanism and UNCITRAL arbitration mechanism, are used or directly applied to international commercial arbitration to settle investment disputes. IIAS have traditionally not included the provision of "third-party participation". Because the international investment arbitration usually involves the management behavior of the government for the purpose of protecting the public interest, the international investment arbitration will affect the host country's management decision. At this time, the decision made on the basis of the confidential procedure will affect the implementation of the state's policy and policy, which is not conducive to safeguarding the social and public interests, and thus to safeguarding the legitimacy and legitimacy of international investment arbitration. Therefore, the "third party participation" rules gradually appear in the relevant arbitration rules and cases. Recently, China is negotiating with the United States, Canada and other developed countries in the BIT negotiations, the other side has proposed the BIT draft has formulated "third party participation" clauses, so, should China accept these "third party participation" clauses? Therefore, the "third party participation" rule has become an urgent problem. After a deep study, this paper draws a conclusion that China, a developing country that mainly participates in international investment activities as a capital importing country, accepts the "third party participation" rule under certain conditions, which generally has more advantages than disadvantages. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the paper is divided into four chapters: The first chapter introduces how the "third party participation" rules enter the international investment arbitration and develop rapidly. The second chapter discusses the latest development of the "third party participation" rules in the ICSID system and the United States BIT 2004) model. At the same time, through the analysis of the cases of international investment arbitration, it generalizes some preferences of the arbitration tribunal in the "third party participation" rules. In order to lay a foundation for China to accept the "third-party participation" rule. The third chapter analyzes the potential benefits and negative effects of accepting the "third party participation" rules. The conclusion is that China, a developing country that mainly participates in international investment activities as a capital importing country, has more advantages than disadvantages on the whole. Chapter four gives some suggestions on how to construct the rules of "third party participation" in Chinese BIT from three aspects: subject, right and obligation.
【學位授予單位】：廣西大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D997.4

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前5條

1 蔡從燕;;外國投資者利用國際投資仲裁機制新發(fā)展反思——國際法實施機制與南北矛盾的雙重視角[J];法學家;2007年03期

2 張光;;中國利用ICSID國際仲裁機制的立法思考[J];廣西財經學院學報;2006年02期

3 肖永平,房沫;仲裁實體法選擇方法思考[J];淮陰師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2004年03期

4 張澤濤;美國“法院之友”制度研究[J];中國法學;2004年01期

5 張圣翠;NAFTA投資規(guī)則及其影響[J];政治與法律;2005年02期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 陳榮;論國際投資爭端中的仲裁[D];西南政法大學;2007年

2 徐峰;ICSID改革與發(fā)展中國家[D];廈門大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1830550