本文選題：農(nóng)民工犯罪　切入點(diǎn)：文化沖突　出處：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2005年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)的農(nóng)民工犯罪問(wèn)題已經(jīng)成為一個(gè)嚴(yán)重的社會(huì)問(wèn)題。上個(gè)世紀(jì)80年代以來(lái),我國(guó)經(jīng)歷了類似于西方國(guó)家的工業(yè)化、城市化、現(xiàn)代化過(guò)程,也類似地付出了犯罪率激增、社會(huì)陣痛的代價(jià)。不同的是我國(guó)的農(nóng)民工——這一獨(dú)特的群體,在這一過(guò)程中扮演了獨(dú)特的角色。城市在享受著農(nóng)民工廉價(jià)勞動(dòng)力帶來(lái)的飛速繁榮的同時(shí),也被農(nóng)民工的高犯罪率所深深困擾。 文化沖突論(culture conflict theory)是上個(gè)世紀(jì)三十年代末由美國(guó)犯罪學(xué)家、社會(huì)學(xué)家索爾斯坦·塞林(Thorsten Sellin,1896—1994)提出的一種解釋犯罪的觀點(diǎn),他認(rèn)為:“刑法是主流文化行為規(guī)范的表現(xiàn),犯罪則是與主流文化相沖突的下層階級(jí)和少數(shù)民族群體文化的產(chǎn)物;由于下層階級(jí)和少數(shù)民族群體文化與主流文化相沖突,所以遵從下層階級(jí)和少數(shù)民族群體的文化,就必然會(huì)產(chǎn)生違犯刑法的犯罪行為�！蔽幕瘺_突論被認(rèn)為特別適合于解釋下層階級(jí)文化群體、少數(shù)民族群體和移民群體中的犯罪。 對(duì)農(nóng)民工這么大一個(gè)群體的犯罪現(xiàn)象的解讀,單從個(gè)體犯罪學(xué)的角度是無(wú)法透徹理解的,單從整體犯罪學(xué)的角度也過(guò)于籠統(tǒng),而文化沖突論恰好提供了一個(gè)整合的視角,它為犯罪尋求的是一種個(gè)體化了的社會(huì)原因,有學(xué)者稱“在整體主義犯罪學(xué)與個(gè)體主義犯罪學(xué)之間尋求一種中介即文化沖突理論,經(jīng)由它使得犯罪在宏觀層面和微觀層面得到合理的解釋�！� 本文共分四章: 第一章介紹農(nóng)民工的定義、社會(huì)屬性、社會(huì)地位和農(nóng)民工犯罪的現(xiàn)狀。農(nóng)民工是社會(huì)的底層群體,也是現(xiàn)在公認(rèn)的高犯罪群體。農(nóng)民工犯罪的特點(diǎn)有:財(cái)型犯罪最多,犯罪時(shí)間具有明顯的季節(jié)性,犯罪者低齡化和低受教育程度,犯罪目標(biāo)相當(dāng)隨機(jī)、盲目,“自救式犯罪”多,農(nóng)村進(jìn)城女性的賣淫現(xiàn)象嚴(yán)重,犯罪的團(tuán)伙化傾向突出。 第二章用文化沖突的視角解讀農(nóng)民工犯罪的原因,可以看到農(nóng)民工受到城市文化與鄉(xiāng)村文化,傳統(tǒng)文化與現(xiàn)代文化以及窮富兩個(gè)階層文化的沖突,他們已經(jīng)形成獨(dú)具特色的農(nóng)民工亞文化——邊緣文化。
[Abstract]:The crime of migrant workers in China has become a serious social problem. Since the 1980s, our country has experienced a similar process of industrialization, urbanization and modernization similar to that of the western countries, and has similarly paid a sharp increase in the crime rate. The cost of social labor pains. The difference is that our country's migrant workers, this unique group, have played a unique role in this process. While cities enjoy the rapid prosperity brought by migrant workers' cheap labor, It is also deeply troubled by the high crime rate of migrant workers. Culture conflict the Theory of Cultural conflict is a view of explaining crime put forward by the American criminologist and sociologist Thorsten Sellinn (1896-1994) in the late 1930s. He holds that criminal law is the expression of the mainstream cultural norms of conduct. Crime, on the other hand, is the product of the lower class and the minority group culture, which conflict with the mainstream culture; because of the conflict between the lower class and the minority group culture and the mainstream culture, the lower class and minority groups follow the culture of the lower class and the minority group. "the theory of cultural conflict is considered to be especially suitable for explaining crimes in the lower class, minority groups and immigrant groups." The interpretation of the criminal phenomenon of such a large group of migrant workers cannot be thoroughly understood from the perspective of individual criminology alone, and from the perspective of overall criminology, it is also too general, while the theory of cultural conflict just provides an integrated perspective. It seeks an individualized social reason for crime. Some scholars say that "seeking an intermediary between holistic criminology and individualistic criminology is the theory of cultural conflict." By doing so, crime is reasonably explained at both the macro and micro levels. " This paper is divided into four chapters:. The first chapter introduces the definition of migrant workers, social attributes, social status and the status of migrant workers. Migrant workers are the bottom of the society, but also recognized as a high crime group. The time of crime has obvious seasonality, the offenders have low age and low education level, the target of crime is quite random, blind, "self-help crime" more, the phenomenon of prostitution of rural women in cities is serious, the tendency of gang crime is prominent. The second chapter explains the reasons of peasant workers' crime from the angle of cultural conflict, and it can be seen that migrant workers are conflicted by urban culture and rural culture, traditional culture and modern culture, as well as the culture of rich and poor. They have formed a unique subculture of migrant workers-marginal culture.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號(hào)】：D917

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 周杏梅;;農(nóng)村勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移與城市社會(huì)治安問(wèn)題研究[J];河南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 后宏偉;城市中農(nóng)民工犯罪問(wèn)題及其預(yù)防[D];蘭州大學(xué);2007年

2 陳越;農(nóng)民工犯罪問(wèn)題研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2007年

3 傅劍;制度缺失與行為越軌[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2007年

4 彭紹霞;農(nóng)民工城市化過(guò)程中的心理沖突與調(diào)適[D];大連海事大學(xué);2007年

5 黃宇;文化沖突的視角：浙江省新生代農(nóng)民工犯罪問(wèn)題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1686142