本文選題：刑訊逼供　切入點(diǎn)：現(xiàn)狀成因　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2005年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑訊逼供在中國有著悠久的歷史傳統(tǒng),時(shí)至今日,其外在表現(xiàn)和價(jià)值基礎(chǔ)發(fā)生了許多變化,已打上鮮明的時(shí)代烙印,但其危害性并未因現(xiàn)政權(quán)的社會(huì)主義性而削弱。刑訊逼供仍在司法實(shí)踐中大行其道,雖屢禁而不止,與現(xiàn)代文明社會(huì)格格不入,成為人所共憤的“頑疾”。刑訊逼供不僅直接造成了大量冤假錯(cuò)案,侵犯公民的人身權(quán)利,而且損害司法機(jī)關(guān)形象,破壞國家的法治環(huán)境,有悖于訴訟文明和司法民主的現(xiàn)代性要求。 遏制刑訊逼供必須深入探究其現(xiàn)狀,科學(xué)分析其特點(diǎn)及成因。本文認(rèn)為刑訊逼供的產(chǎn)生根源是復(fù)雜多樣的,在中國今后相當(dāng)長的時(shí)期內(nèi)仍將“頑強(qiáng)”存在,渴望短期內(nèi)徹底根除刑訊逼供是不現(xiàn)實(shí)的。我們應(yīng)正視刑訊逼供的客觀存在,科學(xué)探究其存在的原因,清醒認(rèn)識(shí)其危害,努力通過制度設(shè)計(jì)及完善將其控制在一定范圍內(nèi)。
[Abstract]:Extorting confessions by torture has a long historical tradition in China. To this day, many changes have taken place in its external performance and value basis. However, its harmfulness has not been weakened by the socialism of the present regime. Extorting confessions by torture is still popular in judicial practice. Torture has not only caused a large number of unjust and false cases, infringed on citizens' personal rights, but also damaged the image of the judicial organs and damaged the legal environment of the country. It runs counter to the modern requirements of litigation civilization and judicial democracy. In order to curb the extortion of confessions by torture, we must deeply explore its present situation, scientifically analyze its characteristics and causes. This paper holds that the root causes of extorting confessions by torture are complex and diverse, and will still exist in China for a long time in the future. It is unrealistic to yearn for the eradication of extortion by torture in a short period of time. We should face up to the objective existence of extortion by torture, explore the causes of its existence scientifically, be aware of its harm, and strive to control it within a certain range through the design and perfection of the system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號(hào)】：D917;D925.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 唐俊杰;;警察為什么刑訊逼供——來自生理學(xué)、心理學(xué)和社會(huì)學(xué)的初步解釋[J];清華法治論衡;2007年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 宋阿玲;論刑事程序法定原則[D];山西大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1695802