本文選題：本體論 + 馬克思哲學(xué)�。� 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：本體論問(wèn)題是哲學(xué)永遠(yuǎn)無(wú)法回避的最基本的問(wèn)題,從古代哲學(xué)發(fā)展至今,關(guān)于本體論的探討從未停歇,可以說(shuō),整個(gè)古代哲學(xué)都是關(guān)于本體論的理論。馬克思哲學(xué)作為一種新的哲學(xué)形態(tài),必然也蘊(yùn)含著深刻的本體論思想。在我國(guó),關(guān)于馬克思哲學(xué)與本體論的關(guān)系問(wèn)題,已成各大學(xué)者爭(zhēng)相討論的重點(diǎn)熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題。馬克思哲學(xué)到底有無(wú)本體論,或者說(shuō)馬克思哲學(xué)的本體論在何種意義上可以成立,它與其他的本體論學(xué)說(shuō)有何異同,是本論文要予以回答的主要問(wèn)題。本文從馬克思哲學(xué)本體論的立論前提入手,闡發(fā)和證明馬克思哲學(xué)本體論存在的必要性和可能性,亦即說(shuō)明馬克思的實(shí)踐概念在本體論范疇的合法性。實(shí)踐本體論的形成經(jīng)過(guò)了一個(gè)漫長(zhǎng)的理論演變過(guò)程,它隨著馬克思思想的發(fā)展經(jīng)歷了一個(gè)由萌芽期到彰顯期,到最后的深化期的逐層發(fā)展過(guò)程,而針對(duì)馬克思思想的純文本解讀是支撐馬克思實(shí)踐本體論最有力的理論依據(jù)�？梢哉f(shuō),實(shí)踐本體論的形成和馬克思實(shí)踐唯物主義的確立是一道進(jìn)行的,二者在理論內(nèi)涵和思想主旨上具有高度的一致性。馬克思實(shí)踐本體論思想的形成在整個(gè)哲學(xué)史具有革命性的意義,它是對(duì)傳統(tǒng)形而上哲學(xué)理論構(gòu)建的徹底摧毀,也是對(duì)近現(xiàn)代哲學(xué)思維方式的徹底重建。實(shí)踐本體論的確立對(duì)于馬克思思想本身的解讀具有不可替代的作用和意義,它不僅揭示了馬克思哲學(xué)的人學(xué)視角,更使得馬克思哲學(xué)擁有了不竭的精神動(dòng)力和理論活力,而它自身所蘊(yùn)含的革命性和現(xiàn)代性特征也對(duì)全球化過(guò)程中產(chǎn)生的問(wèn)題、對(duì)于現(xiàn)代工業(yè)技術(shù)、對(duì)于馬克思主義中國(guó)化的實(shí)踐進(jìn)程具有現(xiàn)實(shí)的指導(dǎo)意義。
[Abstract]:Ontology is the most basic problem that philosophy can never avoid. Since the development of ancient philosophy, the discussion on ontology has never stopped. It can be said that the whole ancient philosophy is the theory of ontology. As a new form of philosophy, Marxist philosophy must also contain profound ontological thoughts. In China, the relationship between Marxist philosophy and ontology has become a hot topic for discussion among scholars. Whether Marxist philosophy has ontology or not, or in what sense the ontology of Marxist philosophy can be established, and what similarities and differences it has with other ontological theories, is the main question to be answered in this paper. Starting with the premise of Marxist philosophical ontology, this paper expounds and proves the necessity and possibility of the existence of Marxist philosophical ontology, that is, the legitimacy of Marx's concept of practice in the category of ontology. The formation of practical ontology has gone through a long process of theoretical evolution. With the development of Marx's thought, it has experienced a gradual development process from budding period to revealing period, to the final deepening period. The pure text interpretation of Marx's thought is the most powerful theoretical basis to support Marx's practical ontology. It can be said that the formation of practical ontology and the establishment of Marxist practical materialism are carried out together, and they are highly consistent in theoretical connotation and ideological purport. The formation of Marx's practical ontology is of revolutionary significance in the whole history of philosophy. It is the complete destruction of the construction of the traditional metaphysical philosophy theory and the thorough reconstruction of the thinking mode of modern philosophy. The establishment of practical ontology has an irreplaceable function and significance for the interpretation of Marx's thought itself. It not only reveals the human perspective of Marxist philosophy, but also makes Marxist philosophy have an inexhaustible spiritual power and theoretical vitality. The revolutionary and modern characteristics it contains also have realistic guiding significance to the problems in the process of globalization, to the modern industrial technology and to the practice process of Marxism in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：A811

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 劉家良;;馬克思的實(shí)踐本體論及其當(dāng)代意義[J];東華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期

2 何中華;;實(shí)踐唯物主義的奠基之作——再讀馬克思《關(guān)于費(fèi)爾巴哈的提綱》[J];東岳論叢;2006年03期

3 何中華;論馬克思實(shí)踐觀的本體論向度——重讀《關(guān)于費(fèi)爾巴哈的提綱》[J];河北學(xué)刊;2003年04期

4 鄒詩(shī)鵬;;馬克思實(shí)踐哲學(xué)的現(xiàn)代性質(zhì)[J];馬克思主義與現(xiàn)實(shí);2007年01期

5 趙司空;;論《德意志意識(shí)形態(tài)》中的實(shí)踐本體論[J];馬克思主義哲學(xué)研究;2006年00期

6 俞吾金;馬克思哲學(xué)是社會(huì)生產(chǎn)關(guān)系本體論[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;2001年10期

7 楊耕;關(guān)于馬克思實(shí)踐本體論的再思考[J];學(xué)術(shù)月刊;2004年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1884123