中國社會學(xué)鄉(xiāng)村研究與再研究的比較分析
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-07 08:15
【摘要】：再研究作為一種社會學(xué)的研究取向,近年來越來越受到學(xué)術(shù)界的關(guān)注。目前的社會學(xué)再研究大多是在某一特定的鄉(xiāng)村社會中開展實地調(diào)查研究,尤其是一些學(xué)術(shù)名村,學(xué)者們在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上進行更進一步的探究,以實現(xiàn)學(xué)術(shù)對話。 本文以中國社會學(xué)鄉(xiāng)村研究與再研究的比較分析為主體,分析的四組案例都是具有學(xué)術(shù)傳承性的著作,分別為《金翼》與《銀翅》、《祿村農(nóng)田》與《土地象征》、《祖蔭之下》與《地域的等級》、《芒市邊民的擺》與《人神之間》,對比四組再研究的方法、內(nèi)容、過程與結(jié)論,通過對比研究可以發(fā)現(xiàn),再研究需要在現(xiàn)有的研究基礎(chǔ)上進行具有繼承和反思性的研究,這種研究必須具備創(chuàng)新性,不僅僅是對研究地點的社會變遷事實有新的發(fā)現(xiàn),還應(yīng)更多的關(guān)注前者在研究中未能注意到或沒有解釋的現(xiàn)象及問題,以這些主題作為再研究的切入點,才能夠有助于學(xué)術(shù)的承前啟后。在此基礎(chǔ)上闡述了再研究模式的必要性及意義,從方法論層面講,它更多的具有人文主義傾向,強調(diào)分析研究中的歷史性視角,注重文化因素的影響；在研究方法的層面,列舉了其在實踐研究中的幾個具體取向,包括研究對象的選擇均為已開辟的研究點、在研究維度上將歷時研究與共時研究相結(jié)合、重視本土實踐與研究對話等。最后,通過以上論述,筆者提出,社會學(xué)的四種研究范式在指導(dǎo)研究的過程中均缺少歷史變遷的視角,而再研究則注重社會的變遷對某一社區(qū)或社會現(xiàn)象的影響,從而提出新的解釋。因此,筆者認(rèn)為再研究模式可能具有社會學(xué)研究的范式意義,值得進行更為深刻地討論。
[Abstract]:As a sociological research orientation, restudy has attracted more and more attention in recent years. At present, most of the sociological restudies are carried out in a particular rural society, especially in some famous academic villages. On the basis of previous studies, scholars carry out further research in order to achieve academic dialogue. In this paper, the comparative analysis of Chinese sociological rural research and re-study is taken as the main body. The four groups of cases analyzed are all works of academic inheritance, namely "Golden Wing" and "Silver Wing", "Lucun farmland" and "Land symbol", respectively. "under the shadow of the ancestor" and "the rank of the region", "the pendulum of the border people in Mango" and "between man and god", compare the methods, contents, processes and conclusions of the four groups of restudies. Through comparative study, we can find that, The further research needs to carry on the inheritance and the reflective research based on the existing research, this kind of research must have the innovation, not only has the new discovery to the social change fact of the research place, We should also pay more attention to the phenomena and problems which the former did not notice or did not explain in the research. Only by using these topics as the starting point of re-study can it be helpful for academic research to carry forward the past and the future. On the basis of this, it expounds the necessity and significance of the re-research model. From the perspective of methodology, it has the tendency of humanism, emphasizes the historical angle of view in the analysis and studies, and pays attention to the influence of cultural factors. At the level of research methods, it lists several specific orientations in practical research, including that the choice of research object is a research point that has been opened up, and combines diachronic research with synchronic research in the research dimension. Attach importance to local practice and research dialogue. Finally, through the above discussion, the author points out that the four research paradigms of sociology all lack the perspective of historical change in the process of guiding the research, and pay more attention to the influence of the social changes on a certain community or social phenomenon. Thus, a new interpretation is proposed. Therefore, the author thinks that the re-research model may have the significance of sociological research paradigm, and it is worth discussing more deeply.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：C912.82
本文編號：2315745
[Abstract]:As a sociological research orientation, restudy has attracted more and more attention in recent years. At present, most of the sociological restudies are carried out in a particular rural society, especially in some famous academic villages. On the basis of previous studies, scholars carry out further research in order to achieve academic dialogue. In this paper, the comparative analysis of Chinese sociological rural research and re-study is taken as the main body. The four groups of cases analyzed are all works of academic inheritance, namely "Golden Wing" and "Silver Wing", "Lucun farmland" and "Land symbol", respectively. "under the shadow of the ancestor" and "the rank of the region", "the pendulum of the border people in Mango" and "between man and god", compare the methods, contents, processes and conclusions of the four groups of restudies. Through comparative study, we can find that, The further research needs to carry on the inheritance and the reflective research based on the existing research, this kind of research must have the innovation, not only has the new discovery to the social change fact of the research place, We should also pay more attention to the phenomena and problems which the former did not notice or did not explain in the research. Only by using these topics as the starting point of re-study can it be helpful for academic research to carry forward the past and the future. On the basis of this, it expounds the necessity and significance of the re-research model. From the perspective of methodology, it has the tendency of humanism, emphasizes the historical angle of view in the analysis and studies, and pays attention to the influence of cultural factors. At the level of research methods, it lists several specific orientations in practical research, including that the choice of research object is a research point that has been opened up, and combines diachronic research with synchronic research in the research dimension. Attach importance to local practice and research dialogue. Finally, through the above discussion, the author points out that the four research paradigms of sociology all lack the perspective of historical change in the process of guiding the research, and pay more attention to the influence of the social changes on a certain community or social phenomenon. Thus, a new interpretation is proposed. Therefore, the author thinks that the re-research model may have the significance of sociological research paradigm, and it is worth discussing more deeply.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：C912.82
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 費孝通;重讀《江村經(jīng)濟·序言》[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1996年04期
2 包路芳;;從村屯到城市——李景漢北京郊區(qū)調(diào)查80年回訪[J];北京社會科學(xué);2006年06期
3 周逸先;;梁漱溟早期鄉(xiāng)村教育實踐研究[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年01期
4 李文鋼;;“擺”是一種傣族消解社會身份的宗教儀式——讀《芒市邊民的擺》[J];德宏師范高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2011年03期
5 張海超;;鄉(xiāng)村調(diào)查與人類學(xué)的方向——七十年后重讀《祿村農(nóng)田》[J];讀書;2009年05期
6 丁利剛 ,趙善陽;陳翰笙與中國農(nóng)村社會學(xué)研究[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1985年04期
7 段偉菊;大樹底下同乘涼——《祖蔭下》重訪與西鎮(zhèn)人族群認(rèn)同的變遷[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年01期
8 石峰;民族志文本的本土實驗——評《金翼》與《銀翅》[J];貴州民族研究;2002年02期
9 李章鵬;;20世紀(jì)二三十年代陳翰笙農(nóng)村調(diào)查的歷史考察[J];河北學(xué)刊;2006年02期
10 薛偉強;;晏陽初研究八十年[J];河北學(xué)刊;2006年02期
，本文編號：2315745
本文鏈接：http://www.lk138.cn/shekelunwen/shgj/2315745.html
最近更新
教材專著
