【摘要】：從漢魏到兩晉南北朝,經(jīng)典注釋的體例和面貌發(fā)生了明顯的轉(zhuǎn)變。其中之一是以裴松之《三國志注》為標(biāo)志,史注打破了對經(jīng)注的因襲模擬,確立了經(jīng)典注釋的征引范式。這一注釋范式影響深遠(yuǎn),劉孝標(biāo)《世說注》、酈道元《水經(jīng)注》與李善《文選注》皆承其緒,又各有發(fā)明,合稱四大名注。四大名注皆征引浩繁,然而因其所注原書之性質(zhì)、內(nèi)容有異,故對典籍之征引亦各有側(cè)重,從中又可見出時代學(xué)術(shù)之特色。四大名注的產(chǎn)生,除經(jīng)典注釋發(fā)展自身的原因外,與南朝以來重視知識、重視典故的學(xué)術(shù)風(fēng)氣以及四位注者個人的學(xué)術(shù)追求有關(guān),也離不開時代典籍之富這一必要條件。
[Abstract]:From the Han and Wei dynasties to the Southern and Northern dynasties of Jin and Jin dynasties, the style and appearance of classical annotation have changed obviously. One of them is taking Pei Songzhi's the Notes of the three Kingdoms as the symbol, the historical notes break the imitation of the scriptures, and establish the citation paradigm of the classical annotations. This annotation paradigm has a profound influence. Liu Xiaobian, Li Daoyuan, Shui Jing, and Li Shan all follow their thread, and each of them has inventions, which are collectively called the four Great Nomenclature Notes. The four famous notes are all cited in numerous ways, but because of the different nature and content of the original book, they also have their own emphasis on the classic books, from which we can see the academic characteristics of the times. Besides the reasons for the development of classical annotations, the emergence of the four famous notes is related to the academic atmosphere of attaching importance to knowledge, the allusion and the academic pursuit of the four annotators since the Southern Dynasty, which is also indispensable to the prosperity of the classical books of the times.
【作者單位】： 黑龍江大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金重大項目“漢魏六朝集部文獻(xiàn)集成”(編號:13&ZD109);國家社科基金一般項目“學(xué)術(shù)史視域下李善《文選注》引書研究”(編號:16BZW049) 中國博士后科學(xué)基金第59批面上資助項目“李善《文選注》經(jīng)部引書研究”(編號:2016M590307)
【分類號】：K23

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 叢曉靜;郭璞引書考[J];邢臺職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年04期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號：2171287