本文選題：明代 + 邊鎮(zhèn)�。� 參考：《史學月刊》2017年12期

【摘要】：明代邊鎮(zhèn)軍士月糧,按制度規(guī)定,必須照時價折銀。而從當時邊鎮(zhèn)非災荒、虜患時期的糧價以及月糧售價、軍士對月糧折價認可度等方面考察,明代月糧折價反映的是邊鎮(zhèn)正常年份的糧價狀況。邊鎮(zhèn)月糧折銀有例折價、常折價、臨時調(diào)整折價三種類型,其中例折價與常折價反映的是各邊鎮(zhèn)糧食價格的平價或常價,臨時調(diào)整折價反映的是個別年份的價格。根據(jù)邊鎮(zhèn)月糧折價梯級分布的特點看,明代邊鎮(zhèn)并沒有形成統(tǒng)一的糧食市場,這符合當時陸運成本極高的市場分割原則。在明代北方的普遍情形是,1市石等于1.67倉石(標準石),故按市石計量的北方及邊鎮(zhèn)糧價顯得很高,以至于普遍認為北方糧價高于南方,這可能是個誤區(qū)。
[Abstract]:The Ming Dynasty border town army sergeant monthly grain, according to the system stipulates, must take off the silver at the time price. And from the non famine at the time of the town, the grain price of the period of war, the price of the monthly grain, the approval degree of the monthly grain discount, and so on. The discount price of the Ming Dynasty is reflected in the state of the grain price in the normal year of the border town. There are three types of price, of which the price and the normal price of the grain prices in each town are reflected by the discount and the constant discount. The temporary adjustment discount reflects the price of the individual years. According to the characteristics of the cascade distribution of the grain discount in the border town, the Ming Dynasty does not form a unified grain market in the Ming Dynasty, which is in line with the market segmentation principle with high cost of land transportation at that time. In the north of the Ming Dynasty, the common situation in the north of the Ming Dynasty is that the 1 cities are equal to 1.67 stone (standard stone), so the grain price of the north and the border towns measured by the city stone is so high that it is generally believed that the northern grain price is higher than the south, which may be a misunderstanding.

【作者單位】： 浙江師范大學人文學院歷史系、環(huán)東海海疆與海洋文化研究所、江南文化研究中心;
【分類號】：K248

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 張金奎;;明代衛(wèi)所月糧制度淺論[J];明史研究論叢;2007年00期

相關會議論文 前1條

1 張金奎;;明代衛(wèi)所月糧制度淺論[A];明史研究論叢（第七輯）[C];2007年

，

本文編號：1889875