調(diào)解被認(rèn)為是化解矛盾沖突的重要方式之一。調(diào)解的過(guò)程異常復(fù)雜,涉及的因素眾多。因而,調(diào)解研究呈現(xiàn)出明顯的跨學(xué)科特征,吸引了包括法學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)、心理學(xué)、政治學(xué)與國(guó)際關(guān)系、語(yǔ)言學(xué)等在內(nèi)多學(xué)科學(xué)者的共同參與。不可否認(rèn)的是,語(yǔ)言在調(diào)解活動(dòng)中發(fā)揮著不可替代的作用。從語(yǔ)言學(xué)的視角來(lái)看,調(diào)解是一種發(fā)生在第三方調(diào)解者與當(dāng)事人之間的會(huì)話(huà)互動(dòng)形式。當(dāng)前,關(guān)于調(diào)解活動(dòng)中語(yǔ)言使用的研究主要有兩大特點(diǎn):其一,在已有的研究中,英美國(guó)家的研究者居多,研究對(duì)象也多為西方式調(diào)解。相較而言,以其他國(guó)家或文化族群的調(diào)解為對(duì)象的研究并不多,針對(duì)中國(guó)本土調(diào)解類(lèi)型的研究則更為稀少。其二,大部分研究的關(guān)注點(diǎn)主要在描述調(diào)解活動(dòng)中的語(yǔ)言行為與互動(dòng)結(jié)構(gòu)特征,及其與活動(dòng)機(jī)構(gòu)屬性或社會(huì)要素之間的關(guān)聯(lián)性,但很少探究特定的文化語(yǔ)境對(duì)調(diào)解語(yǔ)言使用的影響。我們認(rèn)為,調(diào)解活動(dòng)不僅是一項(xiàng)言語(yǔ)活動(dòng),同時(shí)也是一種文化實(shí)踐。在調(diào)解過(guò)程中,各參與者的語(yǔ)言行為的產(chǎn)出與理解不但受到了特定活動(dòng)類(lèi)型的制約,同時(shí)也受該文化語(yǔ)境要素(如信念、價(jià)值觀、規(guī)約等)的驅(qū)動(dòng)。本研究在文化語(yǔ)用學(xué)的理論框架下,基于對(duì)十個(gè)真實(shí)的調(diào)解案例進(jìn)行語(yǔ)料分析,旨在探究中國(guó)民間調(diào)解活動(dòng)的語(yǔ)言使用特點(diǎn)及文...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：196 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士

【文章目錄】：
ABSTRACT
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Research background
    1.2 Research questions
    1.3 The database
    1.4 Organization of this dissertation
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 A general picture of mediation
        2.1.1 Definitions
        2.1.2 Distinctive features
        2.1.3 Varieties of mediation
    2.2 Linguistic approaches to mediation study
        2.2.1 Mediation in conversation analysis
        2.2.2 Mediation in pragmatics
        2.2.3 Mediation in discourse analysis
        2.2.4 Mediation in rhetoric/argumentation
    2.3 Some remarks
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Pragmatics:a functional inquiry of language use
    3.2 The cultural perspective(s)in pragmatics
        3.2.1 A critique on universalism in pragmatics
        3.2.2 Cross-cultural,intercultural,and cultural pragmatics
    3.3 Cultural pragmatics:an emic account of speech activities
        3.3.1 Speech act
        3.3.2 Activity types
        3.3.3 Cultural context
        3.3.4 An activity-based interpretive model
Chapter Four Disputants' Complaints in Chinese Folk Mediations
    4.1 Defining complaints
    4.2 Characteristics of the complaints in the folk mediation
        4.2.1 Explicit and implicit complaints
        4.2.2 Direct versus indirect complaints
    4.3 Complainee's responses
        4.3.1 Denials
        4.3.2 Counter-complaints
        4.3.3 Re-characterization of the event
    4.4 Complaints and responses:An argument for理/Li
        4.4.1 Complaints,wrongness,and moral work
        4.4.2 Argument between complaints and responses
Chapter Five Mediators' Evaluations in Chinese Folk Mediations
    5.1 Defining evaluations
    5.2 Characteristics of the evaluations in the folk mediation
        5.2.1 Explicit and implicit evaluations
        5.2.2 One-sided versus both/multi-sided evaluations
    5.3 Impartial evaluations:A judgment with理/Li
        5.3.1 Evaluation norm and理/Li
        5.3.2 Impartial evaluation and balance-seeking
Chapter Six Mediators' Directives in Chinese Folk Mediations
    6.1 Defining directives
    6.2 Characteristics of the directives in the folk mediation
        6.2.1 Syntactic forms of mediators' directives
        6.2.2 Dual dimensions of the directive content
    6.3 Disputants' responses to the directives
        6.3.1 Compliance
        6.3.2 Non-compliance
    6.4 Mediators' directives:an explication of理/Li
        6.4.1 Directives,the "right",and理/Li
        6.4.2 Deontic rights and(non-)compliance
Chapter Seven Conclusion
    7.1 Major findings
    7.2 Research significance
    7.3 Limitations and suggestions
Bibliography
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Publications



本文編號(hào)：3985159