本文選題：后殖民主義 + 雜合文本��； 參考：《山西師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2014年S3期

【摘要】：雜合是后殖民文學(xué)的顯著特點(diǎn),后殖民視角關(guān)注文化權(quán)力關(guān)系對(duì)雜合文本翻譯的影響,認(rèn)為在殖民時(shí)代,雜合文本及其翻譯主要體現(xiàn)宗主國(guó)與被殖民國(guó)家的文化權(quán)力關(guān)系。當(dāng)前正是我國(guó)提倡文化大發(fā)展大繁榮時(shí)期,我們不僅面臨發(fā)展壯大自身文化的任務(wù),更要平衡同他國(guó)的文化權(quán)力關(guān)系。新時(shí)期文化的權(quán)力博弈以新的形式進(jìn)行著,帝國(guó)主義文化霸權(quán)和文化殖民依然存在,這些現(xiàn)狀要求譯者明確認(rèn)識(shí)雜合文本包含的文化權(quán)力特點(diǎn),并對(duì)翻譯雜合文本提出新的要求和定位。
[Abstract]:Hybridity is a remarkable feature of post-colonial literature. The post-colonial perspective focuses on the influence of cultural power relations on the translation of hybrid texts, and argues that in colonial times, hybrid texts and their translation mainly reflect the cultural power relationship between the sovereign state and the colonized country. At present, China advocates the great development and prosperity of culture. We are not only faced with the task of developing and strengthening our own culture, but also need to balance the cultural power relations with other countries. The power game of culture in the new period is carried out in a new form, and the imperialist cultural hegemony and cultural colonization still exist. These present situations require the translator to clearly understand the cultural power characteristics contained in the hybrid text. And put forward new requirements and positioning for the translation of hybrid text.
【作者單位】： 太原理工大學(xué)外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：H059

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 張其學(xué);;權(quán)力主體:文化殖民的基礎(chǔ)和源泉[J];馬克思主義研究;2010年09期

2 孫會(huì)軍 ,鄭慶珠;翻譯與文化“雜合”[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究;2003年04期

3 韓子滿;文學(xué)翻譯與雜合[J];中國(guó)翻譯;2002年02期

4 蔣驍華;印度的翻譯:從文化輸出到文化抗衡[J];中國(guó)翻譯;2002年02期

5 王東風(fēng);翻譯研究的后殖民視角[J];中國(guó)翻譯;2003年04期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳奕，

本文編號(hào)：2113833