發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-01-30 08:10

【摘要】：棚戶區(qū)是我國(guó)城市化進(jìn)程中典型的問(wèn)題,棚戶區(qū)改造是解決棚戶區(qū)居民住房條件和住房環(huán)境的重大民生問(wèn)題,是推進(jìn)新型城鎮(zhèn)化全面建設(shè)小康社會(huì)的關(guān)鍵。而在棚戶區(qū)改造工作的各個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)中,資金籌集環(huán)節(jié)是棚戶區(qū)改造工作面臨的最大瓶頸。如何在現(xiàn)有的資金來(lái)源渠道和融資模式的基礎(chǔ)上,拓寬融資渠道、創(chuàng)新融資模式,為棚戶區(qū)改造建設(shè)多方面籌措資金,成為目前面臨的主要現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題。本文首先立足于全國(guó)棚戶區(qū)改造工作的大背景,引出長(zhǎng)春市棚戶改造的現(xiàn)狀情況,系統(tǒng)闡述了棚戶區(qū)改造的相關(guān)基本理論,并深入分析了PPP(Public-private Partnership)模式的涵義、特征和優(yōu)點(diǎn)等,進(jìn)而對(duì)PPP模式在國(guó)內(nèi)外公共基礎(chǔ)領(lǐng)域運(yùn)用的情況進(jìn)行了全面的總結(jié),在此基礎(chǔ)上又歸納出長(zhǎng)春市棚戶區(qū)改造的優(yōu)惠政策,再以長(zhǎng)春棚戶區(qū)現(xiàn)狀和當(dāng)前棚改資金投入現(xiàn)狀為實(shí)例,分析了長(zhǎng)春市棚戶區(qū)改造的資金缺口情況和融資渠道及融資模式,通過(guò)歸納分類具體提出長(zhǎng)春市棚戶區(qū)改造資金融資存在的主要問(wèn)題,一是棚改資金缺口龐大;二是棚改資金融資難;三是融資模式采用的是由政府主導(dǎo)的BT模式;四是融資渠道單一,社會(huì)資本參與比例小。針對(duì)上述問(wèn)題,筆者提出了棚戶區(qū)改造資金的融資對(duì)策,一是從開(kāi)發(fā)企業(yè)投資回報(bào)、PPP模式的特點(diǎn)、國(guó)內(nèi)外PPP模式的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)、推廣PPP模式的政策背景四方面,闡述了棚戶區(qū)改造引入PPP模式融資的可行性,同時(shí)為實(shí)現(xiàn)PPP模式在長(zhǎng)春市棚戶區(qū)改造項(xiàng)目中成功運(yùn)行,提出了一些應(yīng)用的保障措施,以此將PPP模式引入棚戶區(qū)改造項(xiàng)目中,打開(kāi)了棚改融資的新局面。二是提出了全國(guó)社會(huì)保障基金貸款和住房公積金貸款,兩者都可以成為棚戶區(qū)改造資金來(lái)源渠道,都可以解決棚改資金缺口問(wèn)題。但該建議也存在一定的不足,具體表現(xiàn)為全國(guó)社會(huì)保障基金會(huì)直屬于國(guó)務(wù)院管理,若要使用社會(huì)保障基金作為信貸資金投入到棚戶區(qū)改造中,則需要積極爭(zhēng)取,相應(yīng)有所難度,但是爭(zhēng)取使用的可能性很大。并針對(duì)特殊的零星、夾餡棚戶區(qū)提出采用捆綁、搭配方式,將商業(yè)價(jià)值高的項(xiàng)目與它們有機(jī)組合,為其融資,從而實(shí)現(xiàn)此類棚改地塊的改造。筆者試圖通過(guò)詳實(shí)的數(shù)據(jù)論證以及研究成果為推進(jìn)長(zhǎng)春市新型城鎮(zhèn)化建設(shè)、全面提升城市居民幸福指數(shù)提供全新的思路。
[Abstract]:Shantytown is a typical problem in the process of urbanization in China. Shantytown reconstruction is a major livelihood problem to solve the housing conditions and housing environment of shantytown residents. It is also the key to promote new urbanization to build a well-off society in an all-round way. In every link of shantytown reconstruction, fund raising is the biggest bottleneck of shantytown reconstruction. How to widen the financing channel, innovate the financing mode and raise funds for the reconstruction and construction of shantytown on the basis of the existing sources and modes of financing have become the main realistic problems. Based on the background of shantytown reconstruction in China, this paper introduces the present situation of shantytown reconstruction in Changchun, systematically expounds the basic theory of shantytown reconstruction, and deeply analyzes the meaning of PPP (Public-private Partnership) model. The characteristics and advantages of the PPP model in the public infrastructure at home and abroad are summarized comprehensively, and on this basis, the preferential policies for the reconstruction of shanty towns in Changchun City are summed up. Then taking the current situation of shantytown in Changchun and the current situation of fund investment in shantytown reform as examples, the paper analyzes the situation of fund gap, financing channel and financing mode of shantytown reconstruction in Changchun. Through the induction and classification of the specific proposed Changchun shantytown transformation funds financing problems, the first is the huge gap of funds for greenhouse reform; Second, it is difficult to finance the shed reform fund; third, the financing mode is BT mode led by the government; fourth, the financing channel is single, and the proportion of social capital participation is small. In view of the above problems, the author puts forward the financing countermeasures of shantytown reconstruction fund. The first is from four aspects: the investment return of developing enterprises, the characteristics of PPP model, the successful experience of domestic and foreign PPP model, and the policy background of popularizing PPP model. The feasibility of introducing PPP mode into shantytown reconstruction is expounded. In order to realize the successful operation of PPP model in Changchun shantytown reconstruction project, some applied safeguard measures are put forward to introduce PPP model into shantytown reconstruction project. Opened up the new situation of financing shed change. The second is to put forward the national social security fund loan and housing accumulation fund loan, both of which can be used as the source of funds for shantytown reconstruction and can solve the problem of fund gap in shantyhouse reform. However, the proposal also has some shortcomings. The concrete manifestation of this proposal is that the National Social Security Fund is directly under the management of the State Council. If we want to use the Social Security Fund as a credit fund to invest in the transformation of shantytowns, we need to actively strive for it, and it is difficult to do so. But the odds are high. According to the special piecemeal, stuffing shantytown, the paper puts forward the method of binding and collocation, combining the high commercial value items with them organically, and financing it, so as to realize the transformation of this kind of shed into land. The author tries to provide a new way of thinking to promote the construction of new urbanization and promote the happiness index of urban residents through detailed data and research results.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：F285;F299.23

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬秀蓮;;從政府直接提供到PPP——美國(guó)保障房的實(shí)踐及借鑒[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2016年06期

2 胡加琦;王偉棟;;包頭北梁地區(qū)棚戶區(qū)改造補(bǔ)償和資金問(wèn)題分析[J];住宅與房地產(chǎn);2015年28期

3 國(guó)家開(kāi)發(fā)銀行黨校課題組;郭彥軍;;“新常態(tài)”下棚戶區(qū)改造融資模式探討[J];開(kāi)發(fā)性金融研究;2015年04期

4 劉莉;王萌;于萌;;棚戶區(qū)改造中PPP項(xiàng)目模式探析[J];山東工業(yè)技術(shù);2015年24期

5 繆潔;;試析棚戶區(qū)改造項(xiàng)目的融資模式[J];管理觀察;2015年34期

6 伊然;;國(guó)務(wù)院力推PPP模式 3年內(nèi)棚改1800萬(wàn)套[J];工程機(jī)械;2015年08期

7 王力;程鴻;;中國(guó)PPP模式現(xiàn)狀及問(wèn)題研究[J];現(xiàn)代工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)和信息化;2015年13期

8 付瑞平;;PPP融資模式在棚戶區(qū)改造中的運(yùn)用優(yōu)勢(shì)[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2015年18期

9 吳夏萍;;探析PPP模式在我國(guó)保障性住房中的運(yùn)用[J];全國(guó)商情(經(jīng)濟(jì)理論研究);2015年10期

10 寇元虎;;棚戶區(qū)改造的實(shí)施難點(diǎn)與對(duì)策建議[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2015年05期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 楚德江;;棚戶區(qū)改造的困境與出路——以徐州棚戶區(qū)改造的經(jīng)驗(yàn)為例[A];中國(guó)行政管理學(xué)會(huì)2010年會(huì)暨“政府管理創(chuàng)新”研討會(huì)論文集[C];2010年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 劉婧n\;王守清;馮珂;伍迪;;推PPP模式引入社會(huì)資本：助力棚戶區(qū)改造啃下“硬骨頭”[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)報(bào);2015年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 王海瑩;吉林省城市棚戶區(qū)改造問(wèn)題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2015年

2 劉雅慧;澳大利亞養(yǎng)老基金基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施投資及其對(duì)中國(guó)的啟示[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

3 李海建;濟(jì)南市棚戶區(qū)改造項(xiàng)目融資模式研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2009年

4 張尹;印度孟買(mǎi)貧民窟住房問(wèn)題研究（1947-2000）[D];華東師范大學(xué);2007年

5 施林翊;國(guó)外貧民窟改造初探[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2417930